The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.4 to 36.1. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is 1.6x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.4 to 36.1, ranking #33 overall.

On price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423

  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.4 and ranks #33 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
DeepSeek
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
36.1
#85
45.4
#33
Reasoning
37.0
#75
42.1
#47
Coding
26.6
#67
36.3
#22
Agents
15.7
#86
32.8
#27
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.09 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tool use
15.4#88
24.3#33
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 ($0.09/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 ($0.18/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 25.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423, making it 8.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
284.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
284.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 was released on 2026-04-23, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5 months newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423

Apr 23, 2026

5 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.4 to 36.1. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is made by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 scores CodeForces: 93.9%, HMMT Feb 26: 91.9%, LiveCodeBench: 88.4%, GPQA: 87.4%, MMLU-Pro: 86.4%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 costs $0.09/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.1 vs 45.4), input pricing ($0.09 vs $0.14/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423 is developed by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons