The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched at 45.1 and 49.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.1 and 49.2.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.18/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
45.1
#32
49.2
#19
42.5
#43
48.9
#18
33.1
#33
36.1
#21
30.9
#29
34.7
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$0.09 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
25.7#30
30.7#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

3 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (NL2Repo), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, Toolathlon).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

179.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has 179.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 143.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
304.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
304.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies output context (384,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output384,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released on 2026-07-31, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Jul 31, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 45.1 and 49.2. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.7%, CyberGym: 76.7%, Toolathlon: 70.3%, DSBench-FullStack: 68.7%, DSBench-Hard: 59.6%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.1 vs 49.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.