The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (NL2Repo), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, Toolathlon). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.09/M input and $0.18/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$0.09 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
Released
Jul 2026
Aug 2026
License
MIT
Qwen Community License 1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (NL2Repo), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 2 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, Toolathlon).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

124.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has 124.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 68.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
304.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
180.0Bparameters
304.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
180.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies output context (384,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output384,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released on 2026-07-31, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Jul 31, 2026

3 weeks ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

0 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.7%, CyberGym: 76.7%, Toolathlon: 70.3%, DSBench-FullStack: 68.7%, DSBench-Hard: 59.6%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.