The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched at 52.1 and 49.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 52.1 and 49.1.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.1
#10
49.1
#19
50.1
#13
48.9
#18
40.7
#12
36.1
#23
37.9
#11
35.1
#19
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
41.0#10
32.7#56
31.5#10
31.2#11
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

4 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, NL2Repo, Toolathlon), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (Agents' Last Exam).

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1475.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1475.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 1180.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
1.6Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
1600.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 0 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Aug 13, 2026

4 weeks ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

2 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 52.1 and 49.1. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.9%, CyberGym: 83.3%, Toolathlon: 74.1%, DSBench-FullStack: 71.1%, DSBench-Hard: 67.2%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.1 vs 49.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.