DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs MiniMax M3
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 41.9. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 1.6x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · MiniMax · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 41.9, ranking #17 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
- overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #17 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose MiniMax M3
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
7 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp · 35 for MiniMax M3
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp outperforms in 2 benchmarks (NL2Repo, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while MiniMax M3 is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.22/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than MiniMax M3 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.66/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than MiniMax M3 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, MiniMax M3 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3's 512,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while MiniMax M3 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiniMax M3 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
MiniMax M3
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp was released on 2026-08-21, while MiniMax M3 was released on 2026-06-01.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 3 months newer than MiniMax M3.
Aug 21, 2026
1 weeks ago
2mo newerJun 1, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is available from DeepSeek. MiniMax M3 is available from Fireworks, MiniMax, Novita, Together.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
MiniMax M3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and MiniMax M3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs MiniMax M3.