The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8-27B

MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B are closely matched at 41.9 and 46.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

MiniMax · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 41.9 and 46.1.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-27B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiniMax M3

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
41.9
#42
46.1
#24
41.8
#39
45.6
#24
34.4
#30
34.5
#29
27.8
#38
32.9
#24
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
512,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
MiniMax M3
Qwen3.8-27B
25.1#101
31.5#59
25.6#37
34.1#15
22.8#42
25.0#30
28.2#27
37.7#4
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

35 reported for MiniMax M3 · 26 for Qwen3.8-27B

5 shared

MiniMax M3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OmniDocBench 1.5), while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 4 benchmarks (NL2Repo, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

400.2B diff

MiniMax M3 has 400.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 1440.6% larger.

MiniMax
MiniMax M3
428.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
428.0B
MiniMax M3
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiniMax M3 specifies input context (512,000 tokens). Only MiniMax M3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

MiniMax
MiniMax M3
Input512,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiniMax M3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiniMax M3 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiniMax M3

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiniMax M3 was released on 2026-06-01, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 2 months newer than MiniMax M3.

MiniMax M3

Jun 1, 2026

2 months ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

2 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiniMax M3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, MiniMax M3 or Qwen3.8-27B?

MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 41.9 and 46.1. MiniMax M3 is made by MiniMax and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiniMax M3 compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

MiniMax M3 scores OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.6%, SpreadSheetBench-v1: 89.3%, USAMO 2026: 85.7%, Video-MME: 85.4%, VideoMMMU: 84.6%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B?

MiniMax M3 supports 512K tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.9 vs 46.1), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8-27B?

MiniMax M3 is developed by MiniMax and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.