The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview are closely matched at 48.9 and 52.3 on the LLM Stats Score. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 3.3x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Baidu · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.9 and 52.3.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
DeepSeek
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.9
#28
52.3
#13
Reasoning
47.1
#30
50.7
#12
Coding
36.7
#30
37.9
#20
Agents
33.4
#33
38.5
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
$1.30 / M
$0.28 / M
Output price
$2.60 / M
$1.13 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Tool use
27.4#35
32.2#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 · 13 for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

4 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is better at 4 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench, Humanity's Last Exam (no tools, text-only), NL2Repo).

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Nov 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($1.30/1M tokens) is 4.6x more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($2.60/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input tokens$1.30
Output tokens$2.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1320.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1320.0B more parameters than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview, making it 471.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
1.6Tparameters
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
1600.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 1,048,576 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Sun Nov 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is licensed under MIT, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

MIT

Open weights

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Aug 13, 2026

3 months ago

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

2 days ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita, Together. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.60/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.96/1M

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
✓ Preferred
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.9 and 52.3. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is made by DeepSeek and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 compare to ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.9%, CyberGym: 83.3%, Toolathlon: 74.1%, DSBench-FullStack: 71.1%, DSBench-Hard: 67.2%. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 cheaper than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 4.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 costs $1.30/M input and $2.60/M output via deepinfra. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports 1.0M tokens and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.9 vs 52.3), input pricing ($1.30 vs $0.28/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek and ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu.

Related comparisons