DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Comparing DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
DeepSeek · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is roughly 5.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
- cost matters — it's about 5.5x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5
- you want predictable pricing at $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.43/1M tokens) is 3.4x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($1.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 ($0.87/1M tokens) is 8.6x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($7.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mistral Medium 3.5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 has 1472.0B more parameters than Mistral Medium 3.5, making it 1150.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Medium 3.5's 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.5 is limited to 256,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Mistral Medium 3.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 does not.
Mistral Medium 3.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Mistral Medium 3.5
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Medium 3.5 uses Modified MIT License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Modified MIT License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while Mistral Medium 3.5 was released on 2026-04-29.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is 4 months newer than Mistral Medium 3.5.
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
3mo newerApr 29, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Novita, Together. Mistral Medium 3.5 is available from Mistral AI.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Mistral Medium 3.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Mistral Medium 3.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Mistral Medium 3.5.