Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Comparing Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Gemini 3.7 Flash is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 3.7 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash
- cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($1.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Gemini 3.7 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5 ($7.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mistral Medium 3.5 is more expensive than Gemini 3.7 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Medium 3.5's 256,000 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.7 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Mistral Medium 3.5
License
Usage and distribution terms
Gemini 3.7 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Medium 3.5 uses Modified MIT License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Modified MIT License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Gemini 3.7 Flash was released on 2026-08-13, while Mistral Medium 3.5 was released on 2026-04-29.
Gemini 3.7 Flash is 4 months newer than Mistral Medium 3.5.
Aug 13, 2026
1 weeks ago
3mo newerApr 29, 2026
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 3.7 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Mistral Medium 3.5's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 3.7 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Medium 3.5's cutoff date.
Mar 2026
—
Provider Availability
Gemini 3.7 Flash is available from Google. Mistral Medium 3.5 is available from Mistral AI.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Mistral Medium 3.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.7 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5.