The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash are closely matched at 43.0 and 42.4 on the LLM Stats Score. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 2.1x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.0 and 42.4.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.5 Flash wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

  • cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.0
#49
42.4
#55
43.1
#44
43.3
#43
31.7
#46
30.5
#52
23.6
#64
28.9
#43
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 6
4 of 6
Input price
$1.30 / M
$1.50 / M
Output price
$2.60 / M
$9.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Gemini 3.5 Flash
40.1#14
30.6#75
21.9#48
29.4#11
17.8#39
7.8#92
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max · 16 for Gemini 3.5 Flash

6 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Pro), while Gemini 3.5 Flash is better at 4 benchmarks (LiveBench, MCP Atlas, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon).

Gemini 3.5 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($1.30/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash ($1.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($2.60/1M tokens) is 3.5x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash ($9.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Flash is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input tokens$1.30
Output tokens$2.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input tokens$1.50
Output tokens$9.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 3.5 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Gemini 3.5 Flash is limited to 1,000,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 3.5 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max was released on 2026-04-23, while Gemini 3.5 Flash was released on 2026-05-19.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Apr 23, 2026

5 months ago

Gemini 3.5 Flash

May 19, 2026

4 months ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

—

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Jan 2026

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is available from DeepInfra, Novita, DeepSeek, Fireworks, Together. Gemini 3.5 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $9.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $9.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.0 and 42.4. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.5 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max scores CodeForces: 100.0%, HMMT Feb 26: 95.2%, LiveCodeBench: 93.5%, MathArena Apex: 90.2%, GPQA: 90.1%. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 83.6%, MMMU-Pro: 83.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 78.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 76.2%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs $1.30/M input and $2.60/M output via deepinfra. Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $1.50/M input and $9.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 42.4), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.30 vs $1.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.5 Flash is developed by Google.