The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Kimi K2.6

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 43.4. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 2.7x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 43.4, ranking #15 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is roughly 2.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Kimi K2.6

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.75/M input and $3.50/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
DeepSeek
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
43.4
#53
Reasoning
48.6
#18
43.7
#48
Coding
39.1
#15
33.0
#43
Agents
38.6
#9
26.5
#60
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$3.50 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Kimi K2.6
Math
31.8#67
36.7#37
Vision
32.2#26
28.9#41
Tool use
30.9#7
21.5#60
Multimodal
35.0#14
31.4#29
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 · 28 for Kimi K2.6

2 shared

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BabyVision, Humanity's Last Exam), while Kimi K2.6 is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Kimi K2.6 ($0.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 2.9x cheaper than Kimi K2.6 ($3.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K2.6 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerDeepSeek
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.50
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

236.8B diff

Kimi K2.6 has 236.8B more parameters than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, making it 31.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
763.2Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6
1.0Tparameters
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
1000.0B
Kimi K2.6

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Kimi K2.6's 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Kimi K2.6 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K2.6 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is licensed under MIT, while Kimi K2.6 uses Modified MIT License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

MIT

Open weights

Kimi K2.6

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 was released on 2026-10-17, while Kimi K2.6 was released on 2026-04-20.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 6 months newer than Kimi K2.6.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Oct 17, 2026

0 days ago

6mo newer
Kimi K2.6

Apr 20, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is available from DeepSeek. Kimi K2.6 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Kimi K2.6

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K2.6 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2.6
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Kimi K2.6.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 or Kimi K2.6?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 43.4. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is made by DeepSeek and Kimi K2.6 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 compare to Kimi K2.6 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 scores BabyVision: 92.5%, Chartography: 83.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 77.0%, NL2Repo: 68.2%, AutomationBench: 60.5%. Kimi K2.6 scores V*: 96.9%, AIME 2026: 96.4%, MathVision: 93.2%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.7%, GPQA: 90.5%.

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 cheaper than Kimi K2.6?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via deepseek. Kimi K2.6 costs $0.75/M input and $3.50/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K2.6?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2.6 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K2.6?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 43.4), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.75/M), licensing (MIT vs Modified MIT License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K2.6?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is developed by DeepSeek and Kimi K2.6 is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons