The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Granite 3.3 8B Base

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to -0.5.

DeepSeek · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to -0.5, ranking #12 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Granite 3.3 8B Base

  • you are already invested in the IBM ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.8
#12
-0.5
#328
Reasoning
48.9
#17
-0.7
#322
Coding
44.4
#5
11.1
#160
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.22 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Math
35.2#43
-0.8#298
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 20 for Granite 3.3 8B Base

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Granite 3.3 8B Basedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

755.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 755.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 9241.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
763.2Bparameters
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Granite 3.3 8B Base support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Granite 3.3 8B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 17 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Base.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

4 days ago

1.4yr newer
Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

—

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Granite 3.3 8B Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Granite 3.3 8B Base?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to -0.5. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek and Granite 3.3 8B Base is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to Granite 3.3 8B Base in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs -0.5), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons