The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Jamba 1.5 Large

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 0.9. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 10.6x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · AI21 Labs · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 0.9, ranking #12 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is roughly 10.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 10.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Jamba 1.5 Large

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.8
#12
0.9
#321
48.9
#17
1.0
#313
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.22 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$8.00 / M
Context window
1,040,000
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Jamba 1.5 Large
35.2#43
4.4#282
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 8 for Jamba 1.5 Large

1 shared

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Jamba 1.5 Large is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.22/1M tokens) is 9.1x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.66/1M tokens) is 12.1x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($8.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Large is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerFireworks
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

365.2B diff

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 365.2B more parameters than Jamba 1.5 Large, making it 91.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
763.2Bparameters
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
398.0Bparameters
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
398.0B
Jamba 1.5 Large

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Jamba 1.5 Large's 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Jamba 1.5 Large is limited to 256,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Jamba 1.5 Large uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 25 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Large.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

0 days ago

2.1yr newer
Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Jamba 1.5 Large is available from Bedrock, Google.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Jamba 1.5 Large

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Jamba 1.5 Large side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Jamba 1.5 Large
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Jamba 1.5 Large.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Jamba 1.5 Large?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 0.9. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek and Jamba 1.5 Large is made by AI21 Labs. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to Jamba 1.5 Large in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%.

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 9.1x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via fireworks. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Jamba 1.5 Large?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Jamba 1.5 Large?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs 0.9), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($0.22 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Jamba 1.5 Large?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs.