The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Nova 2 Pro

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 30.8.

DeepSeek · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 30.8, ranking #12 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Nova 2 Pro

  • you are already invested in the Amazon ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek
Nova 2 Pro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.8
#12
30.8
#115
Reasoning
48.9
#17
30.7
#115
Coding
44.4
#5
19.4
#105
Agents
41.3
#4
12.1
#104
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.22 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Nova 2 Pro
Math
35.2#43
25.9#105
Vision
29.5#31
12.3#103
Tool use
35.1#2
15.5#90
Multimodal
34.3#13
9.7#116
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 18 for Nova 2 Pro

1 shared

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Nova 2 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Amazon
Nova 2 Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nova 2 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova 2 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nova 2 Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nova 2 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Nova 2 Pro was released on 2025-12-02.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 9 months newer than Nova 2 Pro.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

0 days ago

9mo newer
Nova 2 Pro

Dec 2, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nova 2 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nova 2 Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Nova 2 Pro.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Nova 2 Pro?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 30.8. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek and Nova 2 Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to Nova 2 Pro in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. Nova 2 Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 92.7%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, ScreenSpot: 88.1%, LongCodeBench: 84.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nova 2 Pro?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nova 2 Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nova 2 Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs 30.8), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nova 2 Pro?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and Nova 2 Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons