Model Comparison

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemma 3 1BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3 1B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemma 3 1B — which is better?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny (by DeepSeek) and Gemma 3 1B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2 Tiny if…

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose Gemma 3 1B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3 1B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.0B diff

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny has 2.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 1B, making it 200.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
3.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3 1B
1.0Bparameters
3.0B
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
1.0B
Gemma 3 1B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 3 1B does not.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 1B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is licensed under deepseek, while Gemma 3 1B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13, while Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemma 3 1B is 3 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.5 years ago

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Supports multimodal inputs
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Google
Gemma 3 1B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Gemma 3 1B.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny or Gemma 3 1B?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny (DeepSeek) and Gemma 3 1B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek VL2 Tiny compare to Gemma 3 1B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%. Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3 1B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (deepseek vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Gemma 3 1B?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons