The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 52.0 to -4.7.

DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.0 to -4.7, ranking #11 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.0 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
DeepSeek
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-4.7
#359
52.0
#11
Reasoning
-12.7
#370
42.2
#50
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
—
1,050,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
GPT-6.1 Sol
Vision
-5.1#207
31.6#26
Multimodal
-3.0#168
30.7#30
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 Tiny · 10 for GPT-6.1 Sol

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and GPT-6.1 Soldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-6.1 Sol specifies input context (1,050,000 tokens). Only GPT-6.1 Sol specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Oct 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and GPT-6.1 Sol support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6.1 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is licensed under deepseek, while GPT-6.1 Sol uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

GPT-6.1 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13, while GPT-6.1 Sol was released on 2026-09-29.

GPT-6.1 Sol is 22 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.8 years ago

GPT-6.1 Sol

Sep 29, 2026

4 days ago

1.8yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6.1 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-30, while DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6.1 Sol's training data extends to 2026-04-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek VL2 Tiny's cutoff date.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

—

GPT-6.1 Sol

Apr 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and GPT-6.1 Sol side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
✓ Preferred
GPT-6.1 Sol
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Sol.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 52.0 to -4.7. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is made by DeepSeek and GPT-6.1 Sol is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 Tiny compare to GPT-6.1 Sol in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%. GPT-6.1 Sol scores HealthBench Consensus: 96.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, OSWorld 2.0: 71.4%, HealthBench Professional: 64.2%, HealthBench: 58.5%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and GPT-6.1 Sol?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-6.1 Sol supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and GPT-6.1 Sol?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.7 vs 52.0), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and GPT-6.1 Sol?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons