The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 9.7 to -4.7.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 9.7 to -4.7, ranking #268 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 9.7 and ranks #268 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-4.7
#351
9.7
#268
-12.7
#362
8.4
#272
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
-5.1#200
6.3#146
-3.0#161
9.1#119
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 Tiny · 28 for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

4 shared

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (DocVQA, InfoVQA, MMMU, MMStar).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

30.5B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 30.5B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny, making it 1016.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
3.0B
DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is licensed under deepseek, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

deepseek

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny was released on 2024-12-13, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 3 months newer than DeepSeek VL2 Tiny.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny

Dec 13, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.6 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 Tiny vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 Tiny or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 9.7 to -4.7. DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 Tiny compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny scores DocVQA: 88.9%, ChartQA: 81.0%, OCRBench: 80.9%, TextVQA: 80.7%, AI2D: 71.6%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.7 vs 9.7), licensing (deepseek vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 Tiny and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 Tiny is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.