The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 vs Nova Lite

DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite are closely matched at 3.1 and 7.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 3.1 and 7.7.

The models split the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Nova Lite also accepts a larger context window (300,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Nova Lite

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 300,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.1
#299
7.7
#277
-1.5
#316
7.2
#272
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 4
2 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.24 / M
Context window
129,280
300,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek VL2
Nova Lite
2.7#163
2.5#164
5.7#133
5.1#134
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 · 27 for Nova Lite

4 shared

DeepSeek VL2 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (DocVQA, TextVQA), while Nova Lite is better at 2 benchmarks (ChartQA, MMMU).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Lite accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek VL2's 129,280 tokens. DeepSeek VL2 can generate longer responses up to 129,280 tokens, while Nova Lite is limited to 2,048 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input300,000 tokens
Output2,048 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while Nova Lite uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while Nova Lite was released on 2024-11-20.

DeepSeek VL2 is 1 month newer than Nova Lite.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

3w newer
Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate. Nova Lite is available from Bedrock.

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate

Nova Lite

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
Nova Lite
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs Nova Lite.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or Nova Lite?

DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 3.1 and 7.7. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and Nova Lite is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to Nova Lite in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and Nova Lite supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.1 vs 7.7), context window (129K vs 300K), licensing (deepseek vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and Nova Lite?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and Nova Lite is developed by Amazon.