The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched at 2.9 and -3.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 2.9 and -3.4.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek VL2 wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

Choose Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.9
#310
-3.4
#343
-1.9
#328
-4.8
#343
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
5 of 6
1 of 6
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
129,280

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek VL2
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
2.1#167
-3.6#194
5.1#137
-1.1#156
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 · 9 for Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

6 shared

DeepSeek VL2 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, MathVista, MMMU, TextVQA), while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMBench).

DeepSeek VL2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.8B diff

DeepSeek VL2 has 22.8B more parameters than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct, making it 542.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
4.2Bparameters
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2
4.2B
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies input context (129,280 tokens). Only DeepSeek VL2 specifies output context (129,280 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while Phi-3.5-vision-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

DeepSeek VL2 is 4 months newer than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

3mo newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 2.9 and -3.4. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to Phi-3.5-vision-instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct scores ScienceQA: 91.3%, POPE: 86.1%, MMBench: 81.9%, ChartQA: 81.8%, AI2D: 78.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.9 vs -3.4), licensing (deepseek vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is developed by Microsoft.