The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek VL2 vs Pixtral Large

Pixtral Large leads the LLM Stats Score 11.8 to 2.9.

DeepSeek · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Pixtral Large leads the overall LLM Stats Score 11.8 to 2.9, ranking #272 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Pixtral Large wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

DeepSeek VL2 also accepts a larger context window (129,280 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 129,280 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

Choose Pixtral Large

  • overall performance matters — it scores 11.8 and ranks #272 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.9
#327
11.8
#272
-1.9
#345
13.1
#256
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
129,280
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek VL2
Pixtral Large
2.1#180
10.9#125
5.0#150
13.2#113
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek VL2 · 7 for Pixtral Large

5 shared

DeepSeek VL2 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Pixtral Large is better at 4 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, MathVista, MMMU).

Pixtral Large significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

97.0B diff

Pixtral Large has 97.0B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2, making it 359.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large
124.0Bparameters
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2
124.0B
Pixtral Large

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek VL2 accepts 129,280 input tokens compared to Pixtral Large's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek VL2 can generate longer responses up to 129,280 tokens, while Pixtral Large is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek VL2 and Pixtral Large support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Pixtral Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek VL2 is licensed under deepseek, while Pixtral Large uses Mistral Research License (MRL) for research; Mistral Commercial License for commercial use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Pixtral Large

Mistral Research License (MRL) for research; Mistral Commercial License for commercial use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13, while Pixtral Large was released on 2024-11-18.

DeepSeek VL2 is 1 month newer than Pixtral Large.

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.8 years ago

3w newer
Pixtral Large

Nov 18, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate. Pixtral Large is available from Mistral AI.

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate

Pixtral Large

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek VL2 and Pixtral Large side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek VL2
✓ Preferred
Pixtral Large
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek VL2 vs Pixtral Large.

Which is better, DeepSeek VL2 or Pixtral Large?

Pixtral Large leads the LLM Stats Score 11.8 to 2.9. DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek and Pixtral Large is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek VL2 compare to Pixtral Large in benchmarks?

DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%. Pixtral Large scores AI2D: 93.8%, DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 88.1%, VQAv2: 80.9%, MM-MT-Bench: 74.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek VL2 and Pixtral Large?

DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens and Pixtral Large supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek VL2 and Pixtral Large?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.9 vs 11.8), context window (129K vs 128K), licensing (deepseek vs Mistral Research License (MRL) for research; Mistral Commercial License for commercial use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek VL2 and Pixtral Large?

DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek and Pixtral Large is developed by Mistral AI.