The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Devstral Small 1.1 vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna leads the LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 9.3. Devstral Small 1.1 is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Mistral AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Luna leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 9.3, ranking #41 overall.

On price, Devstral Small 1.1 is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Luna also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Devstral Small 1.1

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-6 Luna

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.5 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.3
#275
44.5
#41
9.2
#270
40.0
#58
0.7
#243
31.4
#47
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.10 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$0.50 / M
Context window
128,000
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Devstral Small 1.1 · 5 for GPT-6 Luna

No common benchmarks found

Devstral Small 1.1 and GPT-6 Lunadon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Devstral Small 1.1 costs less

For input processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as GPT-6 Luna ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than GPT-6 Luna ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Luna is more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerMistral
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Luna accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to Devstral Small 1.1's 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Luna
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Luna supports multimodal inputs, whereas Devstral Small 1.1 does not.

GPT-6 Luna can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Devstral Small 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Luna

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Devstral Small 1.1 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while GPT-6 Luna uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Devstral Small 1.1

Apache 2.0

Open weights

GPT-6 Luna

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Devstral Small 1.1 was released on 2025-07-11, while GPT-6 Luna was released on 2026-09-22.

GPT-6 Luna is 15 months newer than Devstral Small 1.1.

Devstral Small 1.1

Jul 11, 2025

1.2 years ago

GPT-6 Luna

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Luna has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-18, while Devstral Small 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Luna's training data extends to 2026-05-18, but cannot make a direct comparison without Devstral Small 1.1's cutoff date.

Devstral Small 1.1

GPT-6 Luna

May 2026

Provider Availability

Devstral Small 1.1 is available from Mistral AI. GPT-6 Luna is available from OpenAI.

Devstral Small 1.1

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

GPT-6 Luna

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Devstral Small 1.1 and GPT-6 Luna side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Devstral Small 1.1
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Luna
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Devstral Small 1.1 vs GPT-6 Luna.

Which is better, Devstral Small 1.1 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna leads the LLM Stats Score 44.5 to 9.3. Devstral Small 1.1 is made by Mistral AI and GPT-6 Luna is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Devstral Small 1.1 compare to GPT-6 Luna in benchmarks?

Devstral Small 1.1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 53.6%. GPT-6 Luna scores DeepSWE 1.1: 66.6%, OSWorld 2.0: 52.7%, Agents' Last Exam: 50.9%, FrontierCode 1.1: 42.4%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 20.7%.

Is Devstral Small 1.1 cheaper than GPT-6 Luna?

Both models cost $0.10 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Devstral Small 1.1 and GPT-6 Luna?

Devstral Small 1.1 supports 128K tokens and GPT-6 Luna supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Devstral Small 1.1 and GPT-6 Luna?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.3 vs 44.5), context window (128K vs 1.1M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Devstral Small 1.1 and GPT-6 Luna?

Devstral Small 1.1 is developed by Mistral AI and GPT-6 Luna is developed by OpenAI.