The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 49.4 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is 3.1x cheaper per token.

Baidu · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Sol leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.4 to -13.4, ranking #21 overall.

On price, ERNIE 4.5 is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Sol also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 4.5

  • cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token

Choose GPT-6 Sol

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.4 and ranks #21 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-13.4
#375
49.4
#21
-13.4
#369
45.6
#29
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.40 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
128,000
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for ERNIE 4.5 · 5 for GPT-6 Sol

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 4.5 and GPT-6 Soldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 4.5 costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Sol ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than GPT-6 Sol ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Sol is more expensive than ERNIE 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Sol accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. GPT-6 Sol can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while ERNIE 4.5 is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Sol
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Sep 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Sol supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.

GPT-6 Sol can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Sol

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Sol

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while GPT-6 Sol was released on 2026-09-22.

GPT-6 Sol is 15 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.2 years ago

GPT-6 Sol

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-6 Sol has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-04-20, while ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-6 Sol's training data extends to 2026-04-20, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 4.5's cutoff date.

ERNIE 4.5

GPT-6 Sol

Apr 2026

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. GPT-6 Sol is available from OpenAI.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

GPT-6 Sol

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Sol
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol leads the LLM Stats Score 49.4 to -13.4. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and GPT-6 Sol is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to GPT-6 Sol in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. GPT-6 Sol scores DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, OSWorld 2.0: 64.4%, Agents' Last Exam: 56.4%, FrontierCode 1.1: 49.3%, AutomationBench v1.0.6: 33.2%.

Is ERNIE 4.5 cheaper than GPT-6 Sol?

ERNIE 4.5 is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output via novita. GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and GPT-6 Sol supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-13.4 vs 49.4), context window (128K vs 1.1M), input pricing ($0.40 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and GPT-6 Sol?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and GPT-6 Sol is developed by OpenAI.