Model Comparison

ERNIE 4.5 vs Qwen3 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

ERNIE 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: ERNIE 4.5 vs Qwen3 Max — which is better?

ERNIE 4.5 (by Baidu) and Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 Max is better at 0 benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, ERNIE 4.5 is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 Max also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose ERNIE 4.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3 Max if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 Max is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 4.5 costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 Max is more expensive than ERNIE 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerNovita
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

979.0B diff

Qwen3 Max has 979.0B more parameters than ERNIE 4.5, making it 4661.9% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
21.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
1.0Tparameters
21.0B
ERNIE 4.5
1000.0B
Qwen3 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 Max accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 Max can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while ERNIE 4.5 is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.

Qwen3 Max is 6 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.

ERNIE 4.5

Jun 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 Max

Dec 15, 2025

7 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. Qwen3 Max is available from Novita.

ERNIE 4.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Qwen3 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (74.0% vs 62.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (256,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and Qwen3 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 4.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 Max
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 4.5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Qwen3 Max.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 or Qwen3 Max?

ERNIE 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 is made by Baidu and Qwen3 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does ERNIE 4.5 compare to Qwen3 Max in benchmarks?

ERNIE 4.5 scores GPQA: 74.0%, ARC-E: 60.7%, PIQA: 55.2%, Winogrande: 51.3%, CLUEWSC: 48.6%. Qwen3 Max scores AIME 2025: 81.6%, t2-bench: 74.8%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.0%, SuperGPQA: 65.1%.

Is ERNIE 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3 Max?

ERNIE 4.5 is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 costs $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output via novita. Qwen3 Max costs $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 4.5 and Qwen3 Max?

ERNIE 4.5 supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 4.5 and Qwen3 Max?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 4.5 and Qwen3 Max?

ERNIE 4.5 is developed by Baidu and Qwen3 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.