ERNIE 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 16.2 to -13.4. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 2.0x cheaper per token.
Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.2 to -13.4, ranking #227 overall.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ERNIE 4.5
- you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $4.00/M output
Choose Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
- overall performance matters — it scores 16.2 and ranks #227 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
20 reported for ERNIE 4.5 · 50 for Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
ERNIE 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SimpleQA).
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($0.18/1M tokens).
For output processing, ERNIE 4.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($2.09/1M tokens).
In conclusion, ERNIE 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
ERNIE 4.5 has 12.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking, making it 133.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to ERNIE 4.5's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while ERNIE 4.5 is limited to 65,536 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 4.5 does not.
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
ERNIE 4.5
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
ERNIE 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ERNIE 4.5 was released on 2025-06-25, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 3 months newer than ERNIE 4.5.
Jun 25, 2025
1.2 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
1.0 years ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
ERNIE 4.5 is available from Novita. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is available from DeepInfra.
ERNIE 4.5
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ERNIE 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ERNIE 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.