Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SimpleQA), while Gemini 2.5 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 2.5 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both ERNIE 5.0 and Gemini 2.5 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2025-01-22, while Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is 4 months newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Flash

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.0

—

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Higher AIME 2025 score (87.0% vs 72.0%)
Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 82.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.0% vs 11.0%)
Higher SimpleQA score (75.0% vs 26.9%)
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
BaiduERNIE 5.0
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.4%, AIME 2024: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 85.3%, GPQA: 82.8%, MMMU: 79.7%.
ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Gemini 2.5 Flash is developed by Google.