Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Grok Imagine Image Pro

Comparing ERNIE 5.0 and Grok Imagine Image Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.0 and Grok Imagine Image Pro don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok Imagine Image Pro specifies input context (131,072 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Input131,072 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

ERNIE 5.0 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Imagine Image Pro does not.

ERNIE 5.0 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2026-01-22, while Grok Imagine Image Pro was released on 2026-02-01.

Grok Imagine Image Pro is 0 month newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2026

2 months ago

Grok Imagine Image Pro

Feb 1, 2026

2 months ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Supports multimodal inputs
xAI
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
xAI
Grok Imagine Image Pro

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Grok Imagine Image Pro

ERNIE 5.0 (Baidu) and Grok Imagine Image Pro (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%.
ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok Imagine Image Pro supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Grok Imagine Image Pro is developed by xAI.