Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA), while Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

ERNIE 5.0 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 does not.

ERNIE 5.0 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2-Instruct-0905

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi K2-Instruct-0905

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2025-01-22, while Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 was released on 2025-09-05.

Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is 8 months newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

Kimi K2-Instruct-0905

Sep 5, 2025

7 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (87.0% vs 49.5%)
Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 75.1%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.0% vs 4.7%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.0% vs 81.1%)
Higher SimpleQA score (75.0% vs 31.0%)
Moonshot AI
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 scores MATH-500: 97.4%, MMLU-Redux: 92.7%, IFEval: 89.8%, AutoLogi: 89.5%, MMLU: 89.5%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is developed by Moonshot AI.