Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs MiniMax M1 40K

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA), while MiniMax M1 40K is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

ERNIE 5.0 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M1 40K does not.

ERNIE 5.0 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M1 40K

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M1 40K uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M1 40K

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2025-01-22, while MiniMax M1 40K was released on 2025-06-16.

MiniMax M1 40K is 5 months newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

MiniMax M1 40K

Jun 16, 2025

10 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (87.0% vs 74.6%)
Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 69.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (39.0% vs 7.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.0% vs 80.6%)
Higher SimpleQA score (75.0% vs 17.9%)
MiniMax
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
MiniMax
MiniMax M1 40K

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs MiniMax M1 40K

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and MiniMax M1 40K is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. MiniMax M1 40K scores MATH-500: 96.0%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, MMLU-Pro: 80.6%, ZebraLogic: 80.1%, OpenAI-MRCR: 2 needle 128k: 76.1%.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and MiniMax M1 40K is developed by MiniMax.