ERNIE 5.0 vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) Comparison

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SimpleQA), while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both ERNIE 5.0 and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2025-01-22, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) was released on 2025-12-04.

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is 11 months newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2025

1.1 years ago

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Dec 4, 2025

3 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 43.9%)
Higher SimpleQA score (75.0% vs 23.8%)

Detailed Comparison