Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

ERNIE 5.0 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct does not.

ERNIE 5.0 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.0 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2025-01-22, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 0 month newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.0's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.0

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (85.0% vs 45.3%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.0% vs 66.3%)
Mistral AI
Larger context window (32,000 tokens)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

ERNIE 5.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%.
ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.