Model Comparison

ERNIE 5.0 vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: ERNIE 5.0 vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

ERNIE 5.0 (by Baidu) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam). Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose ERNIE 5.0 if…

  • you are already invested in the Baidu ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

ERNIE 5.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both ERNIE 5.0 and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

ERNIE 5.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

ERNIE 5.0

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.0 was released on 2026-01-22, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 6 months newer than ERNIE 5.0.

ERNIE 5.0

Jan 22, 2026

6 months ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

2 weeks ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Baidu

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (62.1% vs 39.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.0 and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.0
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Baidu
ERNIE 5.0
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.0 vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.0 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. ERNIE 5.0 is made by Baidu and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does ERNIE 5.0 compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.0 scores AIME 2025: 87.0%, MMLU-Pro: 87.0%, GPQA: 85.0%, SimpleQA: 75.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 39.0%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.0 and Muse Spark 1.1?

ERNIE 5.0 supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes ERNIE 5.0 and Muse Spark 1.1?

ERNIE 5.0 is developed by Baidu and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons