ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 27.1. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 7.0x cheaper per token.
Baidu · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 27.1, ranking #13 overall.
On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 7.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 7.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro
- you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 16 for Gemini 2.5 Pro
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Gemini 2.5 Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 4.5x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 8.8x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro's 1,000,000 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is limited to 1,000,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.
Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Gemini 2.5 Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 18 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Nov 11, 2026
1 days ago
1.5yr newerMay 20, 2025
1.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from DeepInfra, Google.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Gemini 2.5 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Gemini 2.5 Pro.