ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 1.8. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1.0x cheaper per token.
Baidu · IBM · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 1.8, ranking #13 overall.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 14 for Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Granite 3.3 8B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 272.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 3400.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 19 months newer than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.
Nov 11, 2026
1 days ago
1.6yr newerApr 16, 2025
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date.
—
Apr 2024
Provider Availability
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.