The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2.6

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 43.0. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 2.9x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 43.0, ranking #13 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Kimi K2.6

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
43.0
#64
Reasoning
50.7
#12
43.4
#58
Coding
37.9
#20
32.4
#50
Agents
38.5
#11
25.9
#74
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$3.50 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Kimi K2.6
Tool use
32.2#8
21.2#74
Research
29.8#6
26.0#12
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 28 for Kimi K2.6

2 shared

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview outperforms in 2 benchmarks (APEX-Agents, BrowseComp), while Kimi K2.6 is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than Kimi K2.6 ($0.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than Kimi K2.6 ($3.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K2.6 is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.50
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

720.0B diff

Kimi K2.6 has 720.0B more parameters than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview, making it 257.1% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6
1.0Tparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
1000.0B
Kimi K2.6

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Kimi K2.6's 262,144 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Kimi K2.6 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.6
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Kimi K2.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Kimi K2.6 uses Modified MIT License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi K2.6

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Kimi K2.6 was released on 2026-04-20.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 7 months newer than Kimi K2.6.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

6mo newer
Kimi K2.6

Apr 20, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Kimi K2.6 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Kimi K2.6

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Kimi K2.6 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2.6
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2.6.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Kimi K2.6?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 43.0. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Kimi K2.6 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Kimi K2.6 in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Kimi K2.6 scores V*: 96.9%, AIME 2026: 96.4%, MathVision: 93.2%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.7%, GPQA: 90.5%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Kimi K2.6?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Kimi K2.6 costs $0.75/M input and $3.50/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Kimi K2.6?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2.6 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Kimi K2.6?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 43.0), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.75/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Modified MIT License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Kimi K2.6?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Kimi K2.6 is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons