The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -0.2.

Baidu · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -0.2, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
-0.2
#372
Reasoning
50.7
#12
-0.5
#364
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

210.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 210.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct, making it 300.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 26 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

2.1yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -0.2. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -0.2), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons