The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -1.8. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 9.8x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -1.8, ranking #13 overall.

On price, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is roughly 9.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 9.8x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
-1.8
#382
Reasoning
50.7
#12
-1.4
#372
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.05 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$0.05 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 11 for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 5.6x more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 22.6x more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input tokens$0.05
Output tokens$0.05
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

269.4B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 269.4B more parameters than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct, making it 2541.5% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
10.6Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
10.6B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 26 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

2.1yr newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

—

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Dec 2023

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Sambanova, Bedrock, Groq, Together, Fireworks.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.05/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.16/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.16/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -1.8. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct scores AI2D: 91.1%, DocVQA: 88.4%, ChartQA: 83.4%, VQAv2 (test): 75.2%, MMLU: 73.0%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 5.6x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct costs $0.05/M input and $0.05/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -1.8), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.05/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons