The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -6.6. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 39.4x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -6.6, ranking #13 overall.

On price, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is roughly 39.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 39.4x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
-6.6
#408
Reasoning
50.7
#12
-7.3
#401
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.01 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$0.02 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Tool use
32.2#8
4.7#194
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 15 for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 28.0x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.01/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 56.5x more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct ($0.02/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.01
Output tokens$0.02
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

276.8B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 276.8B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 8622.7% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
3.2Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
3.2B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct uses Llama 3.2 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 26 months newer than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

2.1yr newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.01/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.02/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to -6.6. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Llama 3.2 3B Instruct in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores NIH/Multi-needle: 84.7%, ARC-C: 78.6%, GSM8k: 77.7%, IFEval: 77.4%, HellaSwag: 69.8%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is 28.0x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.01/M input and $0.02/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs -6.6), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.01/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.2 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons