ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 4 Scout
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.2. Llama 4 Scout is 3.6x cheaper per token.
Baidu · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.2, ranking #13 overall.
On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 3.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
- overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Llama 4 Scout
- cost matters — it's about 3.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 12 for Llama 4 Scout
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 4 Scoutdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 3.5x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).
For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 3.8x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 171.0B more parameters than Llama 4 Scout, making it 156.9% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is limited to 1,048,576 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.
Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Llama 4 Scout
License
Usage and distribution terms
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Llama 4 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 20 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.
Nov 11, 2026
1 days ago
1.6yr newerApr 5, 2025
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Llama 4 Scout
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Llama 4 Scout.