The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs MiniMax M2

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 26.2. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Baidu · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 26.2, ranking #13 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose MiniMax M2

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
MiniMax M2
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
26.2
#188
Reasoning
50.7
#12
25.9
#187
Coding
37.9
#20
18.0
#147
Agents
38.5
#11
8.1
#168
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
MiniMax M2
Tool use
32.2#8
9.4#165
Research
29.8#6
0.8#88
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 16 for MiniMax M2

1 shared

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while MiniMax M2 is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than MiniMax M2 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than MiniMax M2 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiniMax M2 is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

50.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 50.0B more parameters than MiniMax M2, making it 21.7% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
MiniMax
MiniMax M2
230.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
230.0B
MiniMax M2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M2's 1,000,000 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while MiniMax M2 is limited to 1,000,000 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output1,000,000 tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiniMax M2 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

MiniMax M2

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while MiniMax M2 was released on 2025-10-27.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 13 months newer than MiniMax M2.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1.0yr newer
MiniMax M2

Oct 27, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. MiniMax M2 is available from MiniMax, Novita.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

MiniMax M2

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and MiniMax M2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs MiniMax M2.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or MiniMax M2?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 26.2. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and MiniMax M2 is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to MiniMax M2 in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. MiniMax M2 scores Tau2 Telecom: 87.0%, LiveCodeBench: 83.0%, MMLU-Pro: 82.0%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, GPQA: 78.0%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than MiniMax M2?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. MiniMax M2 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and MiniMax M2?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M2 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and MiniMax M2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 26.2), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and MiniMax M2?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and MiniMax M2 is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons