The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 10.5. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 4.9x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 10.5, ranking #13 overall.

On price, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is roughly 4.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

  • cost matters — it's about 4.9x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
10.5
#306
Reasoning
50.7
#12
10.8
#301
Coding
37.9
#20
6.7
#228
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,100

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 4 for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 11.3x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Nov 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

277.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 277.0B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 9233.3% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 131,100 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is limited to 131,100 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Sat Nov 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 11 months newer than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

11mo newer
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 10.5. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 2.8x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 10.5), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons