The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral Large 4

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 46.0. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 2.1x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 46.0, ranking #13 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Mistral Large 4

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
46.0
#46
Reasoning
50.7
#12
44.5
#51
Coding
37.9
#20
34.8
#37
Agents
38.5
#11
33.1
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.70 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$2.10 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Mistral Large 4
Tool use
32.2#8
30.3#15
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 20 for Mistral Large 4

4 shared

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AutomationBench, BrowseComp, DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0), while Mistral Large 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Mistral Large 4 ($0.70/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than Mistral Large 4 ($2.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Mistral Large 4 is more expensive than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4
Input tokens$0.70
Output tokens$2.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

770.0B diff

Mistral Large 4 has 770.0B more parameters than ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview, making it 275.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4
1.1Tparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
1050.0B
Mistral Large 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Large 4's 1,000,000 tokens. Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Large 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Mistral Large 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Large 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Large 4 uses Modified MIT License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Large 4

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Mistral Large 4 was released on 2026-10-06.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 1 month newer than Mistral Large 4.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1mo newer
Mistral Large 4

Oct 6, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Mistral Large 4 is available from Mistral AI.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Mistral Large 4

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Large 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Mistral Large 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral Large 4.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Mistral Large 4?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 46.0. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Mistral Large 4 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Mistral Large 4 in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Mistral Large 4 scores B3 AI Security Benchmark: 97.1%, CyBench: 93.0%, SciCode: 91.8%, KORABench: 84.5%, BrowseComp: 84.5%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Mistral Large 4?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Mistral Large 4 costs $0.70/M input and $2.10/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Large 4?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Large 4 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Large 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 46.0), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.70/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Modified MIT License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Large 4?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Mistral Large 4 is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons