The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral Small

Comparing ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Baidu · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Mistral Small is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Mistral Small

  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,048,576
32,768

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 0 for Mistral Small

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Smalldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Mistral Small ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Mistral Small ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Mistral Small.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Mistral AI
Mistral Small
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

258.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 258.0B more parameters than Mistral Small, making it 1172.7% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small
22.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
22.0B
Mistral Small

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small's 32,768 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Mistral Small is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small uses Mistral Research License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small

Mistral Research License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Mistral Small was released on 2024-09-17.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 26 months newer than Mistral Small.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

2.2yr newer
Mistral Small

Sep 17, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Mistral Small is available from Mistral AI.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Mistral Small

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral Small.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Mistral Small?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview (Baidu) and Mistral Small (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Mistral Small in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Mistral Small?

Mistral Small is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Mistral Small costs $0.20/M input and $0.60/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 33K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Mistral Research License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Mistral Small is developed by Mistral AI.