The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.9. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 4.6x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.9, ranking #13 overall.

On price, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is roughly 4.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 4.6x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
7.9
#325
Reasoning
50.7
#12
7.3
#325
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
128,000

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 15 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 5.6x more expensive than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

256.4B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 256.4B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct, making it 1086.4% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
23.6Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
23.6B
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Nov 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 17 months newer than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1.4yr newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Jun 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview's cutoff date.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

—

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.9. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.9%, AI2D: 92.9%, HumanEval Plus: 92.9%, ChartQA: 87.4%, IF: 84.8%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 3.7x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct costs $0.07/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 7.9), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.07/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons