The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 4.8.

Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 4.8, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
4.8
#344
Reasoning
50.7
#12
0.8
#358
Coding
37.9
#20
1.0
#278
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5-Omni-7Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

273.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 273.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 3900.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 20 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

1 days ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 4.8. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 4.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons