The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 23.1. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 1.0x cheaper per token.

Baidu · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 23.1, ranking #13 overall.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Baidu
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#13
23.1
#215
Reasoning
50.7
#12
23.8
#198
Agents
38.5
#11
11.8
#141
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$1.13 / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
1,048,576
65,536

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Tool use
32.2#8
10.6#152
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview · 23 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

No common benchmarks found

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs less

For input processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview ($1.13/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Nov 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$1.13
Best providerBaidu
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

200.0B diff

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview has 200.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 250.0% larger.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
280.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
80.0Bparameters
280.0B
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
80.0B
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Baidu
ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat Nov 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview was released on 2026-11-11, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is 14 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

Nov 11, 2026

2 days ago

1.2yr newer
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is available from Baidu Qianfan. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview

baidu logo
Baidu
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.13/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 23.1. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is made by Baidu and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview scores BrowseComp: 87.4%, DRACO: 84.9%, MCP Atlas: 84.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 71.2%, OfficeQA Pro: 67.9%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

Is ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview costs $0.28/M input and $1.13/M output via baidu. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 23.1), context window (1.0M vs 66K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

ERNIE 5.5 Flash Preview is developed by Baidu and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons