The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 are closely matched at 26.0 and 24.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

LG AI Research · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 26.0 and 24.2.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, EXAONE 4.5 33B wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
26.0
#152
24.2
#166
26.6
#145
23.9
#161
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
7 of 7
0 of 7
Input price
— / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.55 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
28.4#93
23.9#122
13.4#95
9.1#132
10.6#123
5.8#149
14.9#45
11.3#69
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for EXAONE 4.5 33B · 25 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

7 shared

EXAONE 4.5 33B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, IFEval, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, Tau2 Airline, Tau2 Retail), while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is better at 0 benchmarks.

EXAONE 4.5 33B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

202.0B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 has 202.0B more parameters than EXAONE 4.5 33B, making it 612.1% larger.

LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
33.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
235.0Bparameters
33.0B
EXAONE 4.5 33B
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 does not.

EXAONE 4.5 33B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

EXAONE 4.5 33B is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22.

EXAONE 4.5 33B is 9 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

5 months ago

8mo newer
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Jul 22, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm EXAONE 4.5 33B's training data extends to 2024-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507's cutoff date.

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

EXAONE 4.5 33B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better, EXAONE 4.5 33B or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 26.0 and 24.2. EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does EXAONE 4.5 33B compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 in benchmarks?

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 scores ZebraLogic: 95.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.1%, IFEval: 88.7%, MultiPL-E: 87.9%, Creative Writing v3: 87.5%.

What are the context window sizes for EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (26.0 vs 24.2), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes EXAONE 4.5 33B and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.