Model Comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is 8.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MathVista, MMLU, MMMU).

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.0 Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 6.0x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 10.0x cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 01 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro's 32,760 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.0 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Wed Apr 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 8 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.1 years ago

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (67.2% vs 27.9%)
Higher MATH score (78.3% vs 32.6%)
Higher MathVista score (67.7% vs 46.6%)
Higher MMLU score (90.4% vs 71.8%)
Higher MMMU score (68.3% vs 47.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%, MMMU: 47.9%. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic.
Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (33K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic.