The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 17.0 to -4.8.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.0 to -4.8, ranking #198 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.0 and ranks #198 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-4.8
#335
17.0
#198
Reasoning
-7.4
#334
17.3
#192
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Context window
32,760
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 3 for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

2 shared

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU).

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is 11 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.6 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a cutoff of 2024-08-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has more recent training data (up to 2024-08-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro (2024-02-01).

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

6 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 17.0 to -4.8. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.8 vs 17.0), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons