The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is 6.0x cheaper per token.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Gemini 1.0 Pro is roughly 6.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 6.0x cheaper per token

Choose Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Google
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.50 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
$12.00 / M
Context window
32,760
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 1 for Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

1 shared

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is better at 1 benchmark (FLEURS).

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 1.0 Pro costs less

For input processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 1.0 Pro ($1.50/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe ($12.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is more expensive than Gemini 1.0 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe was released on 2026-08-26.

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is 31 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.6 years ago

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

Aug 26, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Gemini 3.5 Transcribe's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Transcribe's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 1.0 Pro is available from Google. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is available from Google.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Transcribe
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Transcribe.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemini 3.5 Transcribe?

Gemini 3.5 Transcribe significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to Gemini 3.5 Transcribe in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe scores FLEURS: 95.0%.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Transcribe?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro costs $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output via google. Gemini 3.5 Transcribe costs $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 3.5 Transcribe?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.50 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons