The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to -5.4.

Google · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to -5.4, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.4
#373
51.0
#15
Reasoning
-8.0
#372
47.5
#26
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Context window
32,760
—

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 32 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.6 years ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to -5.4. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.4 vs 51.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.0 Pro and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons