The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -5.4.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -5.4, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $1.50/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-5.4
#360
45.7
#29
-8.0
#358
43.2
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Context window
32,760

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.0 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 32 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.6 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -5.4. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.4 vs 45.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 1.0 Pro is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.